Turabian Style Research Paper Help
Many students arrive at college only to be shocked when an instructor tells them that there are specific formats for writing a term paper. Fewer than one in four students know how to write a Turabian style research paper or Chicago format research paper, and indeed even fewer can explain the difference between Turabian format papers and those written in Chicago style. The answer, of course, is that Chicago style papers have a thicker crust. I kid. Turabian style is the same as Chicago style with one small difference. Chicago style is outlined in the Chicago Manual of Style and is designed for popular and scholarly publications, while Turabian style is outlined in the same university’s A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations and is tailored specifically to that type of academic writing. In other words, Kate L. Turabian’s formatting is a subset of Chicago style.
The good news is that the predictability and regularity of Turabian style make it easy to use a template to format an essay, but on the other hand, the sheer number of rules and guidelines make it difficult for students to correctly format every reference when they write a research paper or proposal. This is especially the case for some of the more complicated parts of a bibliography, such as citing a dissertation or a master’s thesis, or a chapter contained in a book. Whole websites exist to list all of the different Chicago/Turabian formatting rules, but it seems that no matter how many rules a guide lists, it is never enough to cover every possibility, leaving students baffled and confused.
The Benefits of Custom Writing
Fortunately, there is way to see how to correctly format a Turabian paper and cite all of the sources you’ll need for it. When you order a custom written sample paper from a reputable term paper writing service, you’ll receive examples of how to cite every source you need for your paper in Turabian style, both in the reference list and in the body of the paper, either as footnotes or parenthetical citations - whichever style you need!
Our writers hold advanced degrees in their field, and because they have been through a Master’s and/or PhD program, they have spent years working with Turabian style to produce their longest and most complex academic documents. They will bring that expertise to your paper because they want to see you succeed. Our writers know the difference between the Turabian note style and the Turabian parenthetical reference style, and they know when to use each style to document your paper. They are familiar with the intricacies of Turabian style, and they have spent the better part of their lives writing in Turabian style for an academic audience. You would be foolish to pass up the opportunity to have our writers’ century or more of combined experience on your side as you develop your paper.
Our Promise to You
In addition to delivering the best Turabian style essays, we also guarantee that every paper we produce will be 100% original and plagiarism free. Our writers have spent so much time in academia that they know the rules about plagiarism like the back of their hand, and they know at a granular level why originality is important. We confirm their commitment to originality by running every paper through specialized software that scans every paper for plagiarism. That way you can feel confident that your paper will meet or exceed your expectations and your needs.
Let us show you how we can help. Our writers are standing by around the clock because we understand that the need for academic writing doesn’t stop once the sun goes down. Whenever you call, email, or use our online form, a customer care representative will be waiting for you, and once you place your order, a top-quality writer will immediately spring into action to deliver your paper fast.
Writing Academic Proposals: Conferences, Articles, and Books
This resource will help undergraduate, graduate, and professional scholars write proposals for academic conferences, articles, and books.
Contributors: Martina Jauch, Allen Brizee
Last Edited: 2018-02-14 03:33:31
An important part of the work completed in academia is sharing our scholarship with others. Such communication takes place when we present at scholarly conferences, publish in peer-reviewed journals, and publish in books. This OWL resource addresses the steps in writing for a variety of academic proposals.
For samples of conference proposals, article abstracts and proposals, and book proposals, click here.
Beginning the process
Make sure you read the call for papers carefully to consider the deadline and orient your topic of presentation around the buzzwords and themes listed in the document. You should take special note of the deadline and submit prior to that date, as late submissions leave a bad impression and suggest poor planning skills.
If you have previously spoken on or submitted a proposal on the same essay topic, you should carefully adjust it specifically for this conference or even completely rewrite the proposal based on your changing and evolving research.
The topic you are proposing should be one that you can cover easily within a time frame of approximately fifteen to twenty minutes. You should stick to the required word limit of the conference call, usually 250 to 300 words. The organizers have to read a large number of proposals, especially in the case of an international or interdisciplinary conference, and will appreciate your brevity.
Structure and components
A conference proposal will typically consist of an introduction to your topic, which should not amount to more than one-third of the length of your submission, followed by your thesis statement and a delineation of your approach to the problem.
You should then explain why your thesis is original and innovative as well as important and interesting to scholars who might be outside your specific area of research. As Kate Turabian states, “whether your role at a conference is to talk or only listen depends not just on the quality of your research, but on the significance of your question” (Turabian, Kate L. A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P, 2007. p. 128). This portion takes up approximately three to five lines, whereas the rest (approximately another third of the total length) focuses on the conclusion that you will arrive at in your essay and exemplary evidence.
Important considerations for the writing process
First and foremost, you need to consider your future audience carefully in order to determine both how specific your topic can be and how much background information you need to provide in your proposal. Larger conferences, such as regional MLA meetings or the ALA (American Literature Association) will require you to direct your remarks to an audience that might not conduct research on the same time period or literary field at all.
Along those lines, you might want to check whether you are basing your research on specific prior research and terminology that requires further explanation. As a rule, always phrase your proposal clearly and specifically, avoid over-the-top phrasing and jargon, but do not negate your own personal writing style in the process.
If you would like to add a quotation to your proposal, you are not required to provide a citation or footnote of the source, although it is generally preferred to mention the author’s name. Always put quotes in quotation marks and take care to limit yourself to at most one or two quotations in the entire proposal text. Furthermore, you should always proofread your proposal carefully and check whether you have integrated details, such as author’s name, the correct number of words, year of publication, etc. correctly.
If you are comparing and contrasting two different authors or subjects, you should clearly outline the process at which you arrive at your conclusion, even in a short proposal. The reader needs to realize the importance and legitimacy of comparing these two themes and get a sense of cohesion.
Types of conference papers and sessions
As a scholar, you may encounter the following presentation types; they cannot be sorted into either the humanities or the sciences. On a general note, however, humanities papers are usually read aloud at a conference, sometimes with the use of audiovisual equipment, and can look at fairly specific aspects of their research area. Social scientists tend to summarize their longer projects and works in order to introduce them to a larger audience and emphasize their usefulness and practical application.
Panel presentations are the most common form of presentation you will encounter in your graduate career. You will be one of three to four participants in a panel or session (the terminology varies depending on the organizers) and be given fifteen to twenty minutes to present your paper. This is often followed by a ten-minute question-and-answer session either immediately after your presentation or after all of the speakers are finished. It is up to the panel organizer to decide upon this framework. In the course of the question-and-answer session, you may also address and query the other panelists if you have questions yourself.
Roundtables feature an average of five to six speakers, each of whom gets the floor for approximately five to ten minutes to speak on their respective topics and/or subtopics. At times, papers from the speakers might be circulated in advance among the roundtable members or even prospective attendees.
Papers with respondents are structured around a speaker who gives an approximately thirty-minute paper and a respondent who contributes his own thoughts, objections, and further questions in the following fifteen minutes. Finally, the speaker gets that same amount of time to formulate his reply to the respondent.
Poster presentations are not very common in the humanities and ask participants to visually display their ideas as either an outline of findings, an essay of several pages length, or, preferably, charts, graphs, artwork, or photographic images.
Reasons proposals fail/common pitfalls
Depending on the conference, acceptance rates of proposals might range from about 10 percent to almost 100 hundred percent of submissions. Accordingly, you will receive some rejections to your submissions in the course of your career, which, in contrast to book proposals or fellowship applications, do not come with an explanation for the rejection.
There are common pitfalls that you might need to improve on for future proposals.
The proposal does not reflect your enthusiasm and persuasiveness, which usually goes hand in hand with hastily written, simply worded proposals. Generally, the better your research has been, the more familiar you are with the subject and the more smoothly your proposal will come together.
Similarly, proposing a topic that is too broad, can harm your chances of being accepted to a conference. Be sure to have a clear focus in your proposal. Usually, this can be avoided by more advanced research to determine what has already been done, especially if the proposal is judged by an important scholar in the field. Check the names of keynote speakers and other attendees of note to avoid repeating known information or not focusing your proposal.
Your paper might simply have lacked the clear language that proposals should contain. On this linguistic level, your proposal might have sounded repetitious, have had boring wording, or simply displayed carelessness and a lack of proofreading, all of which can be remedied by more revisions.